<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Laurabelle&#039;s Blog &#187; Webgeek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.niceperson.org/categories/geek/webgeek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.niceperson.org</link>
	<description>Making it up as I go along.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 02:31:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Opera vs. Firefox</title>
		<link>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/09/22/opera-vs-firefox/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/09/22/opera-vs-firefox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laurabelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Webgeek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.niceperson.org/?p=592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since I installed Opera a few days ago, I've been exploring it and especially comparing it with Firefox. Here's my tally of pros and cons: Opera Screenshots Side panels closed Side panels open Pros Cookie-acceptance dialog has lots of options, so one can choose exactly the terms on which one will accept each cookie. Free [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/09/22/opera-vs-firefox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opera now free-as-in-beer!</title>
		<link>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/09/20/opera-now-free-as-in-beer/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/09/20/opera-now-free-as-in-beer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 04:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laurabelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Webgeek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/09/20/opera-now-free-as-in-beer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've used Opera in the past, but I was not completely won over. Partly it was the advertising; mostly I was just happy with whatever I was using at the time (probably Firefox in one of its previous incarnations as Phoenix or Firebird). Now that Opera is free-as-in-beer, I've decided to give The Other Proprietary [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/09/20/opera-now-free-as-in-beer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>posts_nav_link()</title>
		<link>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/09/06/posts_nav_link/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/09/06/posts_nav_link/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 00:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laurabelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Webgeek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/09/06/posts_nav_link/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I must be a troublemaker. I have run into roughly the same problem with posts_nav_link() as I did with the_content(). Unfortunately, my hackery didn&#8217;t work quite as well this time. My markup validates now, but I&#8217;ve got a bogus next-link that doesn&#8217;t belong there (when there actually isn&#8217;t a next page to go to). I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/09/06/posts_nav_link/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>the_content (more_link_text)</title>
		<link>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/09/05/the_content-more_link_text/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/09/05/the_content-more_link_text/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2005 03:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laurabelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Webgeek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.niceperson.org/?p=443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Warning: WordPress rant coming. How in the bloody effing heck am I supposed to generate valid code with the more_text_link argument to the the_content template tag? What I had been doing was this: the_content ('&#60;div class="morelink"&#62;&#60;p&#62;Continue reading ' . the_title ('&#60;q&#62;', '&#60;/q&#62;', FALSE) . '&#60;/p&#62;&#60;/div&#62;'); However, that gave me output HTML like this: &#60;a href="http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/09/04/heather-park-revisited/#more-441"&#62; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/09/05/the_content-more_link_text/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking stuff</title>
		<link>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/08/31/breaking-stuff/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/08/31/breaking-stuff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 06:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laurabelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Webgeek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/08/31/breaking-stuff/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Y'all are probably taken aback when my page styles shift all of a sudden. So am I, even though I programmed the whole thing. The styles are supposed to be seasonal, but it seems like just as soon as I get used to one color scheme, it changes on me. The holiday themes are especially [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/08/31/breaking-stuff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inevitable</title>
		<link>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/04/12/inevitable/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/04/12/inevitable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laurabelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webgeek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movable Type]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trackback]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niceperson.org/wordpress/2005/04/12/inevitable/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I knew it was going to happen eventually. The Trackback spammers have finally found my weblog. They left fifteen little spams over the last three days, and I found it rather ironic that my last entry about fighting spam got more spam-pings than any other. This minor deluge of spam has at last prodded [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/04/12/inevitable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Denying non-local referrers</title>
		<link>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/02/01/denying-non-local-referrers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/02/01/denying-non-local-referrers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 20:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laurabelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Webgeek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niceperson.org/wordpress/2005/02/01/denying-non-local-referrers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of weeks ago I was trying and not succeeding in blocking external referrers from my CGI directory. I got my sysadmin to enable .htaccess and Mod_Rewrite for that document root, after which I declared success, but actually I never actually tested my rules. (Oops.) I was trying not to use Mod_Rewrite (since it's [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/02/01/denying-non-local-referrers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google and comment spam</title>
		<link>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/02/01/google-and-comment-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/02/01/google-and-comment-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 20:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laurabelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Webgeek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movable Type]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niceperson.org/wordpress/2005/02/01/google-and-comment-spam/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This weekend I noticed that Googlebot had started indexing the URLs of my newly renamed comment script, even though it wasn't actually crawling the pages. Since comment and trackback spammers don't need the content of the page, just the URL, this was not enough for me. I wrote to Google to find out what could [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/02/01/google-and-comment-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nofollow 2: Screwed from both ends</title>
		<link>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/01/22/nofollow-2-screwed-from-both-ends/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/01/22/nofollow-2-screwed-from-both-ends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2005 05:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laurabelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Webgeek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niceperson.org/wordpress/2005/01/22/nofollow-2-screwed-from-both-ends/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Phil Ringnalda is right about nofollow: It only actually stops you from getting spammed when the ocean starts boiling, after we've forced every single person with weblog comments to implement it, and driven the unbelievers off the web. Until then, the spammers and the search engines are going to keep working you from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/01/22/nofollow-2-screwed-from-both-ends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tweezers and a pile of sand</title>
		<link>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/01/22/tweezers-and-a-pile-of-sand/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/01/22/tweezers-and-a-pile-of-sand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2005 10:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laurabelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Webgeek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niceperson.org/wordpress/2005/01/22/tweezers-and-a-pile-of-sand/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like Gloria Craney, I find myself obsessed by referrer spam. For the past few days I've often kept half an eye on my access logs, trying to make sure all requests get 301'd. I tweaked my .htaccess rules. I renamed mt-comments.cgi and mt-tb.cgi. I waged a defensive war. Along with renaming mt-comments.cgi, I also added [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.niceperson.org/2005/01/22/tweezers-and-a-pile-of-sand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

